Congenital heart surgery: surgical performance according to the Aristotle complexity score.

نویسندگان

  • Claudia Arenz
  • Boulos Asfour
  • Viktor Hraska
  • Joachim Photiadis
  • Christoph Haun
  • Ehrenfried Schindler
  • Nicodème Sinzobahamvya
چکیده

OBJECTIVES Aristotle score methodology defines surgical performance as 'complexity score times hospital survival'. We analysed how this performance evolved over time and in correlation with case volume. METHODS Aristotle basic and comprehensive complexity scores and corresponding basic and comprehensive surgical performances were determined for primary (main) procedures carried out from 2006 to 2009. Surgical case volume performance described as unit performance was estimated as 'surgical performance times the number of primary procedures'. RESULTS Basic and comprehensive complexity scores for the whole cohort of procedures (n=1828) were 7.74±2.66 and 9.89±3.91, respectively. With an early survival of 97.5% (1783/1828), mean basic and comprehensive surgical performances reached 7.54±2.54 and 9.64±3.81, respectively. Basic surgical performance varied little over the years: 7.46±2.48 in 2006, 7.43±2.58 in 2007, 7.50±2.76 in 2008 and 7.79±2.54 in 2009. Comprehensive surgical performance decreased from 9.56±3.91 (2006) to 9.22±3.94 (2007), and then to 9.13±3.77 (2008), thereafter increasing up to 10.62±3.67 (2009). No significant change of performance was observed for low comprehensive complexity levels 1-3. Variation concerned level 4 (p=0.048) which involved the majority of procedures (746, or 41% of cases) and level 6 (p<0.0001) which included a few cases (20, or 1%), whereas for level 5, statistical significance was almost attained: p=0.079. With a mean annual number of procedures of 457, mean basic and comprehensive unit performance was estimated at 3447±362 and 4405±577, respectively. Basic unit performance increased year to year from 3036 (2006, 100%) to 3254 (2007, 107.2%), then 3720 (2008, 122.5%), up to 3793 (2009, 124.9%). Comprehensive unit performance also increased: from 3891 (2006, 100%) to 4038 (2007, 103.8%), 4528 (2008, 116.4%) and 5172 (2009, 132.9%). CONCLUSIONS Aristotle scoring of surgical performance allows quality assessment of surgical management of congenital heart disease over time. The newly defined unit performance appears to well reflect the trend of activity and efficiency of a congenital heart surgery department.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Congenital heart disease: interrelation between German diagnoses-related groups system and Aristotle complexity score.

OBJECTIVES The Disease-Related Groups (DRGs) system postulates that inpatient stays with similar levels of clinical complexity are expected to consume similar amounts of resources. This, applied to surgery of congenital heart disease, suggests that the higher the complexity of procedures as estimated by the Aristotle complexity score, the higher hospital reimbursement should be. This study anal...

متن کامل

Stratification of complexity in congenital heart surgery: comparative study of the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) method, Aristotle basic score and Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio- Thoracic Surgery (STS-EACTS) mortality score

OBJECTIVE To determine whether stratification of complexity models in congenital heart surgery (RACHS-1, Aristotle basic score and STS-EACTS mortality score) fit to our center and determine the best method of discriminating hospital mortality. METHODS Surgical procedures in congenital heart diseases in patients under 18 years of age were allocated to the categories proposed by the stratificat...

متن کامل

Initial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results.

BACKGROUND The analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database included the first attempt by the STS to apply a complexity-adjustment method to evaluate congenital heart surgery results. METHODS This data harvest represents the first STS multiinstitutional experience with software utilizing the international nomenclature and dat...

متن کامل

Surgical management of congenital heart disease: evaluation according to the Aristotle score.

OBJECTIVE The Aristotle basic complexity (ABC) score (1.5-15 points) is the sum of potentials for early mortality, morbidity and anticipated surgical technique difficulty. The Aristotle comprehensive complexity (ACC) score (1.5-25 points) is the sum of ABC score and patient-adjusted complexity score; it comprises six complexity levels. We used the ACC score to evaluate quality in surgical manag...

متن کامل

Evaluation of the Aristotle complexity models in adult patients with congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVES The adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population has surpassed the paediatric CHD population. Half of all mortality caused by CHD occurs in adulthood; in some patients, it occurs during surgery. We sought to assess the potential risk factors for adverse outcome after cardiac operations in adults with CHD, and to evaluate the predictive power of the Aristotle score models for hospi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery

دوره 39 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011